On my 31st and a half birthday, it occurred to me: "I will be famous soon. I better write down what it's like to be regular . . . before I forget."
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Luke Father, Luke Son
*heavy breathing through mask*
*copyrighted laser sword swing from the darkness*
*parry*
*fight leads onto a barely-explicable bridge*
FATHER: Tell them. Tell them the truth that you know. Tell them publicly.
*parry*
*fight resumes*
*SON hits FATHER on shoulder with copyrighted laser sword*
FATHER: Ahh!
*FATHER cuts off SON's hand*
SON: Ahhhh!
FATHER: There is no avoiding it. The truth must be made known.
*Son begins to back away down metal beam*
FATHER: Why are you fighting with me?
SON: I'm not. Not in real life.
FATHER: Then why here?
SON: Because it's a device.
*FATHER swings copyrighted laser sword*
FATHER: Like this device?
SON: No. A literary device. To engage a reader's attention and present information in an interesting way.
FATHER: Well, stop it! Stop fighting me! Join me. Together, we can own amazon.com.
SON: I'll never join you. But I'm only saying that for dramatic effect!
FATHER: If you'd only publicly announce what you know about me. If you'd only search your brain and share what you find there with the world!
SON: I've shared enough. I've shared that you've read some novels.
FATHER: NO. I wrote a novel.
*SON's face gets all scrunchy and weird.*
SON: NO! That's so unlikely! It's as unlikely as almost the entire cast of the original Star Wars coming back to do a seventh movie!
FATHER: That is also going to happen. It's coming out around Christmas of next year!
SON: That's not news! Everyone already knows that!
FATHER: Then get back to talking about my novel.
SON: I can't. I can't utter anything intelligible. I'm shocked and missing a hand.
FATHER: Then I will talk. The ebook of A Journey to Reality is available for only $5 here on amazon.com.
SON: Amazon? That's where I bought my worm factory!
FATHER: Yes. Yes!
SON: You can buy a worm factory and an ebook on the same website? My mind is blown!
FATHER: And you can also get both my book and your book for about 1/10 of the price of a worm factory!
SON: THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE!
FATHER: You know it to be true.
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Per Procurationem
You've certainly heard the news by now. The Sovereign Statement, by Bilal Dardai, has been nominated for a 2014 Jeff Award honoring New Work. In other words, some people* on a committee believe that Bilal's work was one of the five best new plays in Chicago between April 2013 and April 2014. Those people are correct.
But this blog is not entitled "Bilal Will Be Famous Soon." Bilal is already kind of famous. He has 1,218 friends on facebook.^ This blog is about me. Me me me me me.
Me.
So let's talk about what exactly Bilal did to get nominated for this award.**
First of all, he chose to become a writer, or at least answered his calling. Then, he wrote a bunch of scripts. A bunch of scripts. Then he re-wrote a bunch of scripts. A bunch of scripts. Then, he wrote this script, The Sovereign Statement. Then, he re-wrote this script. Then, he re-wrote this script. He re-wrote this script until he felt he had the right English words in the right English order as to convey the images, thoughts, and questions he wanted his audience to consider.
In the end, the play we performed had 24,894 meticulously-chosen words. And guess what? 341 are my name. And no. My name is not "is" or "the." I'm talking about my last name--Manship--which appears 332 times in the soon-to-be-famous script, alongside 1 use of my first name and 8 uses of a nickname that I'm not at liberty to share on this blog.
That means that my name alone is 1.36% of The Sovereign Statement. Which means that I am 1.36% of a Jeff-nominated script. Which means that I am 1.36% Jeff-nominated.
In case anyone's counting.
Now, am I enough of a pompous asshole to presume that my name's presence had anything to do with the impending continued wild success of Bilal's script? Of course not.^^ I'm just mightily thankful that as Bilal was adding and subtracting words from this little beauty, he never*** edited me out of the thing.
Accordingly, I'd like to give a brief 1.36% nomination-acceptance speech. It goes like this:
"I'd l . .. "
Music already?
Well, shit.
-----
* Mainly in their 70's from what I can tell
^ He does not, however, have any "like"-rs.
** Hint: It has to do with me.
^^ In the first draft I received, with which Bilal was presumably less satisfied than later drafts, my name appeared only 311 times.
*** Never say never.
But this blog is not entitled "Bilal Will Be Famous Soon." Bilal is already kind of famous. He has 1,218 friends on facebook.^ This blog is about me. Me me me me me.
Me.
So let's talk about what exactly Bilal did to get nominated for this award.**
First of all, he chose to become a writer, or at least answered his calling. Then, he wrote a bunch of scripts. A bunch of scripts. Then he re-wrote a bunch of scripts. A bunch of scripts. Then, he wrote this script, The Sovereign Statement. Then, he re-wrote this script. Then, he re-wrote this script. He re-wrote this script until he felt he had the right English words in the right English order as to convey the images, thoughts, and questions he wanted his audience to consider.
In the end, the play we performed had 24,894 meticulously-chosen words. And guess what? 341 are my name. And no. My name is not "is" or "the." I'm talking about my last name--Manship--which appears 332 times in the soon-to-be-famous script, alongside 1 use of my first name and 8 uses of a nickname that I'm not at liberty to share on this blog.
That means that my name alone is 1.36% of The Sovereign Statement. Which means that I am 1.36% of a Jeff-nominated script. Which means that I am 1.36% Jeff-nominated.
In case anyone's counting.
Now, am I enough of a pompous asshole to presume that my name's presence had anything to do with the impending continued wild success of Bilal's script? Of course not.^^ I'm just mightily thankful that as Bilal was adding and subtracting words from this little beauty, he never*** edited me out of the thing.
Accordingly, I'd like to give a brief 1.36% nomination-acceptance speech. It goes like this:
"I'd l . .. "
Music already?
Well, shit.
-----
* Mainly in their 70's from what I can tell
^ He does not, however, have any "like"-rs.
** Hint: It has to do with me.
^^ In the first draft I received, with which Bilal was presumably less satisfied than later drafts, my name appeared only 311 times.
*** Never say never.
Sunday, March 30, 2014
Someone Else Wrote This
In a bus from
Liberia to Playa Flamingo
west costa of
Costa Rica
six rows back
not including the
side seats
there are no side
seats
unsure of route,
stop, or destination
Window a free-per-view
screen of stars
The heavens
pulled back
A pantalla
abierta
Cortina quitada
None of these
expressions sum it up
It was as if in
this privileged place a miracle occurred
And the
privileged few in a place without privilege were privileged to witness the
entirety of heaven
The entirety of
truth
Seven veils shed
Eternity revealed
There are two
basic viewpoints of eternity
From the left,
you die and forget
From the right, eternal
knowledge
Horror stories,
both
And every tale a
variation
The same, and don’t
let anyone tell you differently
Tonight there was
no tale
No narration
Because a tale is
a cola is a camino
From ignorance at
the start
To wisdom at the
mecca
Tonight a
wormhole
A bending of time
and space
No need to devise
or narrate
The tv is tuned
to channel 3
And there on the
pantalla
A free broadcast
Without deception
or ego
The perilous
emptiness that is
That undeniably
is
And like skin in
the unprotected sun
It went right
through me
Unprepared
A sudden bout of
eternity
One with the
stars because we are one with the stars
When I was young
I saw a piece of wood and felt the world from the tree’s perspective
I was in gym
class
I am still young,
and I felt the world from eternity’s perspective
From a star’s
view
Through the eye
of chaos which is the order which governs our chaos
I thought, “One
day I will forget you. One day you will
forget me. It will be as if we never
were. Our memories will die with us.”
Only time stands
between us and the stars
And time is a
spongey and unreliable buffer
I grew sad
I wanted to fight
but there was in all apparentness no fighting to be done
There is a
balance beam we walk
A piece of wood
Everything
forever on the right
Nothing forever
on the left
And we wobble
Time
Tonight I fell
But clung
Crawled back up
The bus driver
taking turns like he was racing
Time had
commissioned him not to be late
A 10-minute
program, this
Sneak preview
Don’t show your
hand
The couple in
front of me
Younger than me
More time
The man two seats
in front to the left
Less time
An aging specimen
of health
The two of them
maybe sixteen
Looking at each
other, not the stars
The bus empties
With time
The couple gets
off before the viejo
The anciano
I was distressed
How could I
forget you?
How could this
not be part of eternity?
Every human
action fell off the beam in the face of channel 3
Pure and simple
Idiomatic
Cliché perhaps
The sponge of
time
The sponge of time
Fickle
Fragile
The beam no
longer would
How could I not
be me anymore
How can my
memories die with me
Taking you too in
the great flush
You’re stored in
blood
Which flows with
the heart’s rhythm
You will run out
All of this
All of this
Gone
I panicked
I’m building my
house on a bed of clay
On an earthquake’s
fault line
On a volcano
This is the
wisdom I hoped to obtain
A parting gift
Turn in your
memories at the door
Here is a sponge
Channel 3
announcement
Attention all
viewers
You are eternal
You are nothing
Put your
investment in everything
Put your
investment in nothing
Time is a sock
market
Woolen waste
I changed the
channel
Unable to
aguantar
Which is used for
respiration
And turned my
attention quite by accident to the two
The jovenes
She too turned
her head to him
Pressed her
forehead against his nose
Showed him her
teeth
An exuberant
maladapted animal
Kissed him
Every true action
is a part of eternity, I reminded myself
But I didn’t
Not in that
moment
Earlier
In the flow of
time
A few steps back
on the sponge
Kissed him
My thoughts bled
out of me
My memories
My concerns
Kissed him
And here too was
truth
Kissed him
And I won’t
forget
Kissed him
And I didn’t
worry about eternity for one more second.
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
So I Ate A Crocodile
For the second time in the last six months, the press has
written unfairly about me. This time it’s
more than just the Chicago Reader. It’s
USA Today, the BBC, the Huffington Post, the Brisbane Times*. None of them asked me for my side of the
story, or an interview, nor did they request permission to use my image. I’m striking back.
For those of you wondering what I’ve been up to since
early January, there is a lot to sum up.
First, I left Chicago for Boston, where I substitute taught-acted for
three weeks for the organization Urban Improv.
That was back when I was a working artist. Boston was fulfilling, but I knew I needed
more. I needed to grow and change. I needed to dig in to my true self.
So, in early February, I went to Costa Rica. That was more enriching.^ Casting myself out into Nature was good for
me, and I began to build basic survival skills.
I began to get back in touch with my true self, the part so often buried
under elaborate socialization. I shook
hands with my heart of darkness in the shadow mirror of jungle life.^^
It still wasn’t enough.
So, yesterday, I turned myself into a python. Then, I flew to Australia via Chicago.** Then, I ate a crocodile.
What’s the big deal?
This is exactly what it’s like to be an almost-famous artist. Everyone has an opinion on everything you
do. Even when I sit down to have a meal,
someone wants to tell me how long I had to fight for it, how easy it was to
sneak up on, even how long I’m likely to be full. Can’t I have a meal without somebody turning
it into an article, a youtube video, a media frenzy? Can’t I have a few hours to eat a
crocodile?
Frankly, I’m done with this thing people call “civilization.” Tomorrow, I’m going to fly somewhere else and
turn into some other species. Right
after I digest this thing.
USA Today, BBC, Huffington Post, Brisbane Times,
etc: You’ll be hearing from my
agent. He’s an armadillo in Panama. And before you ask: Yes, he’s nocturnal.
---
* media behemoth
^ Who needs an artistic career when you can have a
kitchen full of roaches, a backyard full of poisonous snakes, and the chance to
clear out spiderwebs with your face?
^^ Still got it!
** Sorry I didn’t call while I was in town. I’m a python.
Saturday, January 4, 2014
Emergency Weather Advisory
Issued 12:00 pm
Sunday, January 5, 2014
PLEASE BE ADVISED
The National Weblog Service has issued a conversation warning for Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, and this blog. At this time, any online conversation not hinged in some way to how incredibly fucking cold it is will be outright ignored by the mass of the population. Facebook residents are encouraged during the advisory to take the following banter precautions:
- Limit all online dialogue to the topic of outside temperature
- Repeatedly reference the following statistics: -15 degrees, -55 degree windchills, coldest temperatures in 30 years
- Use the term "polar vortex"
- Assume that the population does not understand the term "polar vortex"
- Become fascinated with the term "polar vortex"
- Link only to stories about how frozen everything is, how polar bears are going inside, and how people are pissing steam
- All pictures posted of the Midwest must include a reference to the planet Hoth
- In addition, non-weather-related emails should include at least one inquiry into the well-being of the recipient in "this weather."
This warning is in effect until 8 pm CST on Tuesday, January 7, 2014.
Sunday, January 5, 2014
PLEASE BE ADVISED
The National Weblog Service has issued a conversation warning for Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, and this blog. At this time, any online conversation not hinged in some way to how incredibly fucking cold it is will be outright ignored by the mass of the population. Facebook residents are encouraged during the advisory to take the following banter precautions:
- Limit all online dialogue to the topic of outside temperature
- Repeatedly reference the following statistics: -15 degrees, -55 degree windchills, coldest temperatures in 30 years
- Use the term "polar vortex"
- Assume that the population does not understand the term "polar vortex"
- Become fascinated with the term "polar vortex"
- Link only to stories about how frozen everything is, how polar bears are going inside, and how people are pissing steam
- All pictures posted of the Midwest must include a reference to the planet Hoth
- In addition, non-weather-related emails should include at least one inquiry into the well-being of the recipient in "this weather."
This warning is in effect until 8 pm CST on Tuesday, January 7, 2014.
###
Friday, January 3, 2014
It's 2014. Give Up on Your Career.
It's just into the new year, and people are posting things on facebook like this. Clearly, the season of reflection has arrived, the time of year in which everyone looks at where their life has gone, where it's going, and where it hasn't gotten to yet. And everyone feels disappointed--or elated.
If you're an artist, you're feeling especially sentimental. You're looking back on a year of earning $1,000, one in which you barely worked As an actor, you didn't get cast in anything except those two shitty projects, one of which cost you more money than you made, the other of which never left the ground. As a musician, you broke your hand, putting you two thousand in the hole and two months out of practice. As a dancer, you worked a lot, but nothing was really your own, and you're keenly aware of another precious year gone by. As you look back at 2013, you realize with trepidation that your artistic career really went nowhere in the last 365.
Or, you're looking back at a year in which your artistic career took major steps forward. You made a whopping $30,000. You performed in five plays and booked a commercial. Your band went on a two month tour. You sold three photos in the same day for $100 each. (Two of the purchasers were people you didn't even know.) You ended the year on a definite upswing, and you can't wait to see what 2014 will bring.
Yes, you are elated / disappointed at the state of your career. Whichever you are feeling, one thing is certain: whether this year was trying or triumphant, you put in the work for a reason. You spent another year dedicated to your art, and that is going to pay dividends. One day, the glass will break. Onward. Upward. Forward.
Bullshit.
Whatever time you spend reflecting on the state of your artistic career, you may as well spend reflecting on how Santa Claus gets all those presents out in 24 little hours. You may as well be reflecting on the Tooth Fairy's tricks of the trade or on what you're going to do when you win that $700 million in Powerball. Because here is the unadulterated reality:
There is no such thing as an artist's "career path."
Perhaps this assertion rings hopeless or unambitious. In that case, let's assume the opposite. If an artist does in fact have a career path, what is it? Does it move from poverty to wealth? From complete obscurity to universal recognition? Or is it a question of quality of work? Does an artist's career path begin with ineptitude and end with complete proficiency? All of these paradigms can be quantified, measured, and mapped, and in their own way, each may vaguely trace an artist's growth. But a career?
I needn't address the first paradigm, that an artist's career is measured in financial success. Even the most entrepreneurial-driven artists will admit that the arts are an exceptionally poor choice for someone who's after the big bucks. There are exceptions in the Keith Lockharts and Quentin Tarantinos of the world, but . . . well, but writing the rest of this paragraph would be a waste of time and web space. Nobody goes into art for the money.
What about recognition, then? Shouldn't artists dream of careers that carry them from bullied elementary school nobody to beloved quirky-brilliant celebrity? As with earning great amounts of money, the odds are against us. Yet surprisingly, many grounded artists who hold no real hope of financial success still squeeze the expectation of one day being recognized, if not universally, then at least on a street corner somewhere.
This expectation is destructive, discouraging, and unfair, because in the 2010's, an everyone-deserves-to-live-their-dreams mindset has collided with an incredible ease of self-promotion and self-production. The result is a wildly saturated artistic landscape in which the traditional publishing, marketing, and producing powers are overwhelmed with attention-seekers, and the public eye is equally overwhelmed with an internet swampland of self-produced work. An artist can create high quality work in his chosen medium for decades, market the hell out of it, yet never have a single attentive eye turn toward it.
More insidious than the futility of this "recognition" career paradigm is its underlying assumption, namely that good work will get attention while bad work will disappear. The trend, unfortunately, leans the other way. Speaking in broad strokes, artists that are widely liked and produced are more properly referred to as entertainers. In earning this title, their work will almost certainly have achieved a certain innocuous quality, stripped largely of its sharpest (and most valuable) ideas, dulled on its edge in order to spoonfeed a common appetite. Again, there are exceptions, celebrities who have become well-recognized and well-compensated by sharing work that is inventive, uncooperative, potentially divisive. Can you name them? Probably on one hand.
Quality of work, then. Can't we measure our careers by our level of skill, by amplified ability? Unfortunately, this paradigm is also false, because true artistic growth moves non-linearly on a scale that is constantly changing. It embraces failure alongside success. It is evasive and amorphous, and when we try to cage it, we may find ourselves looking a different beast in the eye. How do we distinguish quality of work? By how widely well-received a work is? By how financially successful our work is becoming? Suddenly, we may find ourselves regressing and calling it "growth."
So where are we going as artists in 2014? In this humble blogger's opinion, the only true measure of an artist is how well his work expresses truth as he sees it. Everything else is a distraction.
So, yes. The glass will break. But only when you smash your career against it. Then, among the shards of the illusion of ambition, you may find something worth reflecting.
If you're an artist, you're feeling especially sentimental. You're looking back on a year of earning $1,000, one in which you barely worked As an actor, you didn't get cast in anything except those two shitty projects, one of which cost you more money than you made, the other of which never left the ground. As a musician, you broke your hand, putting you two thousand in the hole and two months out of practice. As a dancer, you worked a lot, but nothing was really your own, and you're keenly aware of another precious year gone by. As you look back at 2013, you realize with trepidation that your artistic career really went nowhere in the last 365.
Or, you're looking back at a year in which your artistic career took major steps forward. You made a whopping $30,000. You performed in five plays and booked a commercial. Your band went on a two month tour. You sold three photos in the same day for $100 each. (Two of the purchasers were people you didn't even know.) You ended the year on a definite upswing, and you can't wait to see what 2014 will bring.
Yes, you are elated / disappointed at the state of your career. Whichever you are feeling, one thing is certain: whether this year was trying or triumphant, you put in the work for a reason. You spent another year dedicated to your art, and that is going to pay dividends. One day, the glass will break. Onward. Upward. Forward.
Bullshit.
Whatever time you spend reflecting on the state of your artistic career, you may as well spend reflecting on how Santa Claus gets all those presents out in 24 little hours. You may as well be reflecting on the Tooth Fairy's tricks of the trade or on what you're going to do when you win that $700 million in Powerball. Because here is the unadulterated reality:
There is no such thing as an artist's "career path."
Perhaps this assertion rings hopeless or unambitious. In that case, let's assume the opposite. If an artist does in fact have a career path, what is it? Does it move from poverty to wealth? From complete obscurity to universal recognition? Or is it a question of quality of work? Does an artist's career path begin with ineptitude and end with complete proficiency? All of these paradigms can be quantified, measured, and mapped, and in their own way, each may vaguely trace an artist's growth. But a career?
I needn't address the first paradigm, that an artist's career is measured in financial success. Even the most entrepreneurial-driven artists will admit that the arts are an exceptionally poor choice for someone who's after the big bucks. There are exceptions in the Keith Lockharts and Quentin Tarantinos of the world, but . . . well, but writing the rest of this paragraph would be a waste of time and web space. Nobody goes into art for the money.
What about recognition, then? Shouldn't artists dream of careers that carry them from bullied elementary school nobody to beloved quirky-brilliant celebrity? As with earning great amounts of money, the odds are against us. Yet surprisingly, many grounded artists who hold no real hope of financial success still squeeze the expectation of one day being recognized, if not universally, then at least on a street corner somewhere.
This expectation is destructive, discouraging, and unfair, because in the 2010's, an everyone-deserves-to-live-their-dreams mindset has collided with an incredible ease of self-promotion and self-production. The result is a wildly saturated artistic landscape in which the traditional publishing, marketing, and producing powers are overwhelmed with attention-seekers, and the public eye is equally overwhelmed with an internet swampland of self-produced work. An artist can create high quality work in his chosen medium for decades, market the hell out of it, yet never have a single attentive eye turn toward it.
More insidious than the futility of this "recognition" career paradigm is its underlying assumption, namely that good work will get attention while bad work will disappear. The trend, unfortunately, leans the other way. Speaking in broad strokes, artists that are widely liked and produced are more properly referred to as entertainers. In earning this title, their work will almost certainly have achieved a certain innocuous quality, stripped largely of its sharpest (and most valuable) ideas, dulled on its edge in order to spoonfeed a common appetite. Again, there are exceptions, celebrities who have become well-recognized and well-compensated by sharing work that is inventive, uncooperative, potentially divisive. Can you name them? Probably on one hand.
Quality of work, then. Can't we measure our careers by our level of skill, by amplified ability? Unfortunately, this paradigm is also false, because true artistic growth moves non-linearly on a scale that is constantly changing. It embraces failure alongside success. It is evasive and amorphous, and when we try to cage it, we may find ourselves looking a different beast in the eye. How do we distinguish quality of work? By how widely well-received a work is? By how financially successful our work is becoming? Suddenly, we may find ourselves regressing and calling it "growth."
So where are we going as artists in 2014? In this humble blogger's opinion, the only true measure of an artist is how well his work expresses truth as he sees it. Everything else is a distraction.
So, yes. The glass will break. But only when you smash your career against it. Then, among the shards of the illusion of ambition, you may find something worth reflecting.
Wednesday, December 25, 2013
Holiday Train
Here comes Santa Claus
Here comes Santa Claus
On the holiday train!
We’re going to have the chance to ride the holiday train
again!
See inside the people singing singing
All is merry and bright!
Everyone’s waited almost a year for the holiday train
tonight!
You better not board!
You better not try!
You better not advance!
I’m telling you why:
Santa’s elves are blocking the doors!
O Holiday Train, O Holiday Train
You left us on the platform
You teased us with your Christmas lights
You led us on with pretty sights
How sad you scorned us and took flight
We would have liked to board you.
O Holy Shit
The children are all cryyying
And the parents, they are all pisssed off
Long did they wait
Their smartphones the train scryyyying
They let three trains go by there at the stop
These three days that I have let pass
Thinking of the blog post I’d craft
Merry Christmas, Chicago Transit!
Youuuu can kiss my asssss!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)